An ode to one of my favorite films

“Before he came down here, it never snowed. And afterwards, it did.”

Edward Scissorhands, directed by Tim Burton, is a simultaneously very charming and completely bonkers movie. This movie punctures my heart and soul, and also makes me laugh my ass off. Burton’s gothic yet whimsical style is at it’s height in this one, and it’s unique concept represents theme of innocence and ignorance. Aesthetically a masterpiece, Edward Scissorhands is a one-of-a-kind experience that tells the story of a compellingly flawed character who is misunderstood. And of course, Winona Ryder is stunning.

There is some great filmmaking on display in Once Upon A Time In Hollywood, and there are a few great scenes where Tarantino’s trademark dialogue are at it’s finest. That’s it.

Here’s what bothered me the most. If Tarantino wanted to make a film about the Manson murders, he should’ve made a documentary. The alterartions of historical events in this film are putrid. Sharon Tate was brutally murdered during her pregnancy. And this film just pretends that didn’t happen, and that everything was fine. The Manson murders didn’t get away with their deeds. Why are the Manson murders even depicted in this movie? How does that relate to what is seemingly the main story here; Rick Dalton and Cliff’s decent into irrelevance? And what does changing the course of history add to this? Tarantino so desperately wants this to be okay; in an interview he said that because it’s technically a historical event, it’s okay to depict it. Sure, that’s true. But he’s not depicting it. He’s depicting a falsified version of historical events; a falsified version where a real pregnant woman wasn’t brutally murdered in her own home. For entertainment.

• I AM AWARE Tarantino has altered history in the past and it’s nothing new. However, it all depends on context. Killing Hitler in Inglorious Bastards is much different than pretending that a murder at the hands of a vicious cult that still holds personal effects for people living today didn’t happen. It feels handled poorly, here.

161 minutes of Tarantino giving Margot Robbie’s feet more character development than Sharon Tate. OK.

I feel very alone on this one, seeing everybody’s reviews and scores, but I have to be honest, I was sadly underwhelmed with Tarantino’s new project.

To conclude, I will add some positives of the film. Brad Pitt and Leo obviously steal the show and each have some really memorable moments. Their mannerisms, accents and dialogue are really great and there is a lot to admire and be entertained by in their performances. The soundtrack is expectedly really groovy and it does a good job of selling the setting. The costuming and production design are all admirable.

Overall, I thought Once Upon A Time In Hollywood was weak, dull, and overlong. It had great atmosphere for sure, but the story was a complete dud. There were stretches where it felt like it was going nowhere at all. There’s a lot of watching other people watch tv.

There are films you love that you could talk about endlessly, and then there are films that you love that you just want to sit quietly with. For me, The Farewell is the latter. It’s so soft. It’s not slow, nor without conflict, but it’s gentle. It strikes the perfect balance between comedy and drama. The Farewell is a beautiful film in every regard. Beautiful direction, setting, score, writing and cast. I really loved the comparison of Japanese and American culture vs Chinese culture, and just the study of eastern cultural beliefs when it comes to death, society, and worth. Overall, The Farewell is an exceedingly lovely film.

The blue velvet curtain… I see you Lulu Wang.

Watch the trailer here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RofpAjqwMa8

This is an example post, originally published as part of Blogging University. Enroll in one of our ten programs, and start your blog right.

You’re going to publish a post today. Don’t worry about how your blog looks. Don’t worry if you haven’t given it a name yet, or you’re feeling overwhelmed. Just click the “New Post” button, and tell us why you’re here.

Why do this?

• Because it gives new readers context. What are you about? Why should they read your blog?
• Because it will help you focus you own ideas about your blog and what you’d like to do with it.

The post can be short or long, a personal intro to your life or a bloggy mission statement, a manifesto for the future or a simple outline of your the types of things you hope to publish.

To help you get started, here are a few questions:

• Why are you blogging publicly, rather than keeping a personal journal?
• What topics do you think you’ll write about?
• Who would you love to connect with via your blog?
• If you blog successfully throughout the next year, what would you hope to have accomplished?

You’re not locked into any of this; one of the wonderful things about blogs is how they constantly evolve as we learn, grow, and interact with one another — but it’s good to know where and why you started, and articulating your goals may just give you a few other post ideas.

Can’t think how to get started? Just write the first thing that pops into your head. Anne Lamott, author of a book on writing we love, says that you need to give yourself permission to write a “crappy first draft”. Anne makes a great point — just start writing, and worry about editing it later.

When you’re ready to publish, give your post three to five tags that describe your blog’s focus — writing, photography, fiction, parenting, food, cars, movies, sports, whatever. These tags will help others who care about your topics find you in the Reader. Make sure one of the tags is “zerotohero,” so other new bloggers can find you, too.